Getting a Recovery for Your Automobile Accident and the Emergency Doctrine


If a defendant driver claims that he was blinded by the setting sun and could not see the pedestrian, will the driver have a defense?  

New York’s top court says no.  See Lifson v. City of Syracuse (No. 157, October 13, 2011).

            Mrs. Lifson, a pedestrian, was struck and killed by an automobile while she was crossing a downtown street in Syracuse.  The defendant driver claimed that as he was driving west at sundown, he was blinded by the setting sun and that he could not see Mrs. Lifson.

The driver urged the emergency doctrine defense.  The emergency doctrine holds that when defendant is confronted with an emergency not of his own making, defendant will be excused from liability if he acted reasonably.  In other words, defendant will not be liable if he is faced with an unexpected emergency.

The Court of Appeals said that the emergency doctrine would not be applicable here.  The court said that being blinded by a setting sun while travelling west is foreseeable.  This does not constitute an unforeseen emergency.  The driver should have taken extra precautions.

If you have been injured in an automobile accident, please feel free to call me for a free consultation at 800-581-1434 or write to letters@seitelman.com.

Mark E. Seitelman, 10/13/11, www.seitelman.com.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: